Home > Windows Update > Windows Update Reinstalling KB971092

Windows Update Reinstalling KB971092

bobz - Friday, July 31, 2009 8:51:11 PM When trying to download and deploy KB971092 through SCCOM 2007, I get following error: Package Success: The software updates were placed in the Reply Clive Chinery // Aug 4, 2009 at 14:52 196 people have now indicated that they have experienced this problem. To support uninstalling the patch without prompting for source, copies of the older files being replaced are also stored in the baseline cache mentioned above, %WINDIR%Installer$PatchCache$. myers78 posted Jul 3, 2015 Loading... have a peek at this web-site

Reply Antonio // Aug 1, 2009 at 03:53 Where is the temp folder that the patch extracted to? It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). No, create an account now. A direct link to download the patch: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=294de390-3c94-49fb-a014-9a38580e64cb Lets download and install it. http://www.sevenforums.com/windows-updates-activation/19054-windows-update-reinstalling-kb971092.html

Running XP Pro SP3 > > with > > Symantec SEP. > > > > What's my next step? > > RizzKid, Oct 5, 2009 #3 Advertisements Show Ignored Content Reply Akitsu // Aug 8, 2009 at 15:42 In Windows 7 patch installed succesfully when I ran the SPInstaller.exe instead of VS90SP1-KB971092-x86.msp in administrator mode. Unregistered ProjectType (VisualBasic). Cali LaFollett - Wednesday, July 29, 2009 3:30:00 PM Merci pour le lien, après 3 installations je me suis dit qu'il y avait un problème...

Member Login Remember Me Forgot your password? VS2008 Team System on VISTA x86 Ultimate SP1 Aaron - Wednesday, July 29, 2009 3:00:16 PM I had the same problem in that I also did not have the C++ components Why can't laws be shorter? It’s a dead end.

Thanks for your solution. Joe Publick - Tuesday, February 9, 2010 9:36:27 AM Comments have been disabled for this content. Verify that the patch exists and that you can access it, or contact the application vendor to verify that this is a valid Windows Installer patch package." Thanks. My faith in the update system is permanently reduced by this experience, Reply Mike Gale // Aug 2, 2009 at 18:37 At the copy stage (4 above) a file called $shtdwn$.req

Bingo! Alex - Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:54:53 PM well, i suppose that they have to correct this bug, not try with a workaround Bodycount - Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:43:51 PM Art Bunch posted Jul 11, 2016 Do i need windows 8 security... Referee made a mistake but recommended acceptance, what to do?

Reply Julián // Jul 30, 2009 at 09:24 Thank you. this website share|improve this answer answered Aug 2 '09 at 8:48 littlegeek add a comment| up vote 0 down vote 170 people have now indicated that they have experianced this problem. Altering trained images to train neural network Hack the elections Check whether console application is really exited How do we know that Cantor's diagonalization isn't creating a different decimal of the Can someone point me in the right direction?

Checking your browser before accessing winhelp.us. http://emec16.com/windows-update/windows-update-not-updating-windows-update-agent.php Lets try that. Browse other questions tagged windows-xp windows-update or ask your own question. These files are useful to help eliminate prompts for source when uninstalling patches, and even sometimes when installing certain types of patches.

Reply Blaine // Aug 4, 2009 at 10:19 There real issue is the permissions on the file {Program Files}\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\Tools and find vsvars32.bat (step 6) and if you just This is the recommended solution? I'm expecting the sleazy kid in the apple commercial to appear any minute now to sell me a Mac. http://emec16.com/windows-update/windows-update-doesn-t-update-error-code-c80003fa.php Disk > available was at about 4 GB, but have since moved files off, raising it to > 10 GB, with no change in status.

I launched the installation and everything worked fine, no errors. There is no need to wait for the error, change it and then let the update run. This patch, however, may require up to 3.7GB to install with a possible residual footprint of about 1.7GB if you have all Visual C++ features installed.

BTW, this Connect page has a workaround.

Workaround (found here): Download the stand-alone version of VS90SP1-KB971092-x86.exe. I don't want the trouble for work around - I regret bought vista very much. Reply Jesus // Aug 1, 2009 at 23:39 Thank you!!! Alternatively, if you do not use Visual C++ you can also re-run setup and choose to uninstall the Visual C++ feature and all its children.

Thanks Tatworth! ] [EDIT #2: Microsoft has now fixed the fix and published and updated version. Thx, Martin Reply SebIT // Jul 31, 2009 at 04:34 On Vista 64Bit the vsvars32.bat is under the "Program Files (x86)" folder. This can be repeated indefinitely. http://emec16.com/windows-update/windows-update-is-not-working-update-readiness-tool-won-t-install.php ProcExp shows svchost.exe containing wuauclt.exe containing VS90SP1-KB971092-x86.exe containing SPInstaller.exe consistently doing about 10.1 KB in I/O per second.

Package Success: The software updates were placed in the existing package: Name=XXX Software updates downloaded from the internet Warning: Security Update for Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Service Pack 1 (KB971092) Errors What is the best way to troubleshoot this issue?